Profile
Emily Leonardi
Stats
| Current Rank | Ret. |
| Best Rank | 544 (25 Nov 1991) |
| Titles |  |
| Grand Slams | 0 |
| Main Tour | 0 |
| Masters | 0 |
| Tour Finals | 0 |
| Challengers | 0 |
| Futures | 0 |
Recent Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
| Age | 50(26 May 1974) |
| Country |  Venezuela |
| Birthplace | |
| Height | |
| Weight | |
| Plays | |
| Backhand | |
| Favorite Surface |  Hard 67% |
| Coach | |
| Turned Pro | |
| Player Status | Inactive |
| Prize Money | $0 |
Performance Breakdown
Surface Breakdown
W/L
| Overall | 46.2% | 24 / 28 |
| Hard | 43.6% | 17 / 22 |
| Clay | 53.8% | 7 / 6 |
| Indoor | 0.0% | 0 / 0 |
| Grass | 0.0% | 0 / 0 |
Round Breakdown
W/L
| 4th Round | 25.0% | 3 / 9 |
| 3rd Round | 60.0% | 12 / 8 |
| Qualies Final | 100.0% | 1 / 0 |
| Qualies Round 2 | 20.0% | 1 / 4 |
| Qualies Round 1 | 62.5% | 5 / 3 |
Tournament Level Breakdown
W/L
| Grand Slam | 0.0% | 0 / 0 |
| Masters | 0.0% | 0 / 0 |
| Main Tour | 0.0% | 0 / 0 |
| Cups | 66.7% | 2 / 1 |
| Challengers | 44.7% | 21 / 26 |
| Futures | 0.0% | 0 / 0 |
Opponent Rank Breakdown
W/L
| Vs No.1 | 0.0% | 0 / 0 |
| Vs Top.5 | 0.0% | 0 / 0 |
| Vs Top.10 | 0.0% | 0 / 0 |
| Vs Top.20 | 0.0% | 0 / 0 |
| Vs Top.50 | 0.0% | 0 / 0 |
| Vs Top.100 | 0.0% | 0 / 0 |
| opponent | score | h2h | |||
| ITF York 09 Aug 92 | |||||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 1-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| ITF College Park 02 Aug 92 | |||||
| R3 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| ITF Norfolk 26 Jul 92 | |||||
| R3 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R4 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| ITF New Braunfels 19 Jan 92 | |||||
| R3 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R4 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| ITF Mission 12 Jan 92 | |||||
| R3 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
| ITF Austin 05 Jan 92 | |||||
| R3 | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| ITF Salisbury 29 Sep 91 | |||||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R3 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| ITF Chicago 22 Sep 91 | |||||
| Q2 | 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| ITF York 11 Aug 91 | |||||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| ITF College Park 04 Aug 91 | |||||
| R4 | 7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R3 | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| ITF Chatham 28 Jul 91 | |||||
| R4 | 6-3 4-6 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R3 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Surface Summary
| year | sum. | hard | clay | i.hard | grass |
| 1992 | 3/6 | 3/6 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| 1991 | 14/16 | 11/13 | 3/3 | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| 1990 | 6/5 | 3/3 | 3/2 | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| 1989 | 1/1 | 0/0 | 1/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 |
Singles Titles/Finals 
Titles
No Titles
Finals
No Finals
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
Niemeier Vs. Paolini Prediction (H2H 0-2)
Navarro Vs. Ostapenko Prediction (H2H 0-0)
Ponchet Vs. Ruse Prediction (H2H 0-0)
Andreeva Vs. Alexandrova Prediction (H2H 0-0)
Uchijima Vs. Boisson Prediction (H2H 0-0)
Sabalenka Vs. Mertens Prediction (H2H 8-2)
Svitolina Vs. Kalinina Prediction (H2H 3-0)
Magdalena Frech Vs. Jessica Pegula Prediction (H2H 0-2)
Cori Gauff Vs. Ella Seidel Prediction (H2H 0-0)
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro Vs. Varvara Gracheva Prediction (H2H 1-0)
| ATP Rankings | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  | Jannik Sinner | 9930 PTS |
| 2 |  | Carlos Alcaraz | 7720 PTS |
| 3 |  | Alexander Zverev | 7595 PTS |
| 4 |  | Taylor Fritz | 5280 PTS |
| 5 |  | Novak Djokovic | 4120 PTS |
| 6 |  | Jack Draper | 3870 PTS |
| 7 |  | Alex De Minaur | 3535 PTS |
| 8 |  | Andrey Rublev | 3490 PTS |
| 9 | | Daniil Medvedev | 3290 PTS |
| 10 |  | Casper Ruud | 3215 PTS |
| Tennis Events This Week | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Barcelona Open Banc Sabadell - Barcelona Spain | ||
| BMW Open - Munich Germany | ||
 | Abidjan 1 Challenger Cote d'Ivoire | ||
 | Busan Challenger Korea, Rep. | ||
 | Oeiras 4 Challenger Portugal | ||
 | San Luis Potosi Challenger Mexico | ||
| Tallahassee Challenger United States | ||
 | M15 Antalya Turkey | ||
MatchStat
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
